Colonial Theatre Architectural Report, Block 29 Building 17AThe Theatre of 1716 : A Report on its Proposed Design and Operation

Singleton P. Moorehead

1953

Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library Research Report Series - 288
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library

Williamsburg, Virginia

1990

Sketch [Sketch]

Frontispiece

The Orange Girls

"Now turn, and see where Loaden with her Freight,
A Damsel Stands, and Orange-wench is hight;
See! how her Charge hangs dangling by the Rim,
See! how the Balls blush o'er the Basket-brim;
Butt little those she minds, the cunning Belle
Has other Fish to Fry, and other Fruit to sell;
See! how she whispers yonder youthful Peer,
See! how he smiles, and lends a greedy Ear.
At length 'tis done, the Note o'er Orange wrapt
Has reach'd the Box, and Lays in Lady's lap." From Social Life in the Reign of Queen Anne by John Ashton.

THE THEATRE OF 1716
or The First Theatre in British America at Williamsburg, Virginia


April 2, 1953
A report on its Proposed Design and Operation
by Singleton P. Moorehead
in consultation with
Richard Southern
Theatre Consultant
London, England

CONTENTS

Preliminary1
A Brief Review of the Evidence of the Theatre of 17162
Are We Justified in Assuming a Proper Theatre?3
The Design of the Different Architectural Elements of the Theatre Building5
The Audience9
The Design of the stage; its Equipment and Related Elements11
Section A-A (Long Section) Sheet #5 of the Sketches14
Section D-D and Section Diagram, Sheet #8 of the Sketches17
Section E-E and Section F-F. Sheet #9 of the Sketches19
The Stock of Scenery20
Lighting22
Notes on Interior Colors and Furnishings25
Miscellaneous26
Modifications Required by Law and Alternate Schemes to Accommodate Them29
Sketchesfollowing 32
Illustrationsfollowing Sketches

FOREW0RD

The principal content of this report is concerned with the appearance and operation of Levingston's Theatre. In the sketches and explanatory text no attempt has been made or any consideration given to modern theatre usage either as required by modern laws or customs. The modifications brought about by laws and the several possible schemes to be developed from them follow the text of the principal part.

Preliminary

In a report by the Architects' Office entitled "The First Theatre and its Site." dated December 1, 1947. "… past evidence, new evidence and theories and the new possibilities suggested by them…" were explained. Shortly thereafter the Architectural Department was requested to make a recommendation about "… the new possibilities…" This recommendation was forwarded to Mr. Norton in a memorandum, dated December 31, 1947, a copy of which is included in the present report under Illustration A. Subsequently, the Administrative Officers approved the recommendation and Mr. Norton notified the Architects' Office of this action in a memorandum, dated January 6, 1948.

The Advisory Committee of Architects was asked to review the report and recommendation at their meeting of March 19, 1948 and voted that further study be given the design of the theatre and that sketches be prepared for submission before a final decision by them.

In July, 1948 "The William and Mary Quarterly" published an article by Robert H. Land, Librarian of the College of William and Mary. Mr. Land was then engaged in writing a dissertation for his doctorate in the field of early Virginia theatre and used material he had gathered in this endeavor for the article. He had also carefully reviewed all the pertinent material in the files of Colonial Williamsburg. This came at an opportune time because it meant that the whole field was scrutinized by an outside scholar. No new evidence about the design of the building was forthcoming so that our conclusions remained unchanged.

After completing several special assignments the writer commenced, in the latter part of 1950, research on the design of early British and American theatres. As this phase of the study advanced. it became possible to build up a bibliography. Relevant data from the sources consulted was transposed to numbered cards which were fully indexed. Thus a permanent record is available of a considerable amount of work for the use of interested persons. Tile cards, index and bibliography are not made a part of this report but are on file in the Architectural Department.

During this period it was found that the larger proportion of related published material was on the shelves of the library of the College of William and Mary or of the Library of Congress. This fortunate situation made it possible to do the reading here rather than to travel to other places, as at first feared. The writer is indebted to our Research Department for making it possible to get material from the Library of Congress and other institutions on 1oan as often as needed.

In the meantime we had corresponded with Mr. Richard Southern of London, England, who had been very highly recommended to us as a theatre consultant for our particular problem as he is the leading authority on the history of the operation of the physical English Theatre. Arrangements were made in 1951 for him to help us and his consultation with us since that time has been of the greatest benefit. Indeed, it is hard to see how we could have proceeded unaided by his advice.

Sketches and a list of questions were sent over to Mr. Southern early 2 in the summer of 1951, previous to Mr. Ernest Frank's trip to England. Mr. Frank was therefore able to have several conferences with him as well as to accompany him on a visit of a small 18th century theatre at Richmond, Yorkshire which was in the process of being restored under Mr. Southern's direction for the Corporation of Richmond. See the illustration of a model of the interior of this theatre under Illustration B. Mr. Southern also showed him models of the interior restoration of other early theatres including one of St. George' Hall, King's Lynn — see Illustration C. Both Richmond and King's Lynn contain original evidence of most of the elements of typical early theatre design and are important to us in that they form a tangible basis for the proposed design of the Williamsburg Theatre under discussion. Mr. Frank also visited the Theatre Royal at Bristol, built in 1766, containing much important evidence of which Mr. Southern has very full records. This example likewise has contributed much to our study.

During the summer of 1952, Mr. Mario Campioli had some conferences with Mr. Southern while visiting England and the Continent. He discussed a number of final problems connected with the design of the Theatre of 1716, reviewed Mr. Southern's sketches and inspected his models of early English theatres. Mr. southern also showed him portions of his large collection of material related to English theatre history and lent him a number of documents to bring to Williamsburg to help us on the project. Later, in Sweden, Mr. Campioli visited the 18th century theatre in Drottningholm where he had an opportunity to examine the interior and to see and work some of the scenery and machines. Then at Versailles he was shown the interior and working of Marie Antoinette's little theatre at the Petit Trianon by Miss Jeanne Erhlich, curator at Versailles. Finally at Parma, Italy he visited the famous renaissance Farnese Theatre which greatly influenced so many later theatres in Europe.

With~at going into a complete listing of the various sources consulted, mention should be made of three: Mr. Southern's recent book, "The Georgian Playhouse"; "The Theatre Notebook," an English magazine published quarterly since 1945 and devoted to the history of the English theatre, and Mr. Southern's latest book. "Changeable Scenery — Its Origin and Development in the British Theatre" — all of which have been invaluable in bringing to us the most recent information on the subject.

A Brief Review of the Evidence for the Theatre of 1716

1. The foundations

After very careful digging, foundations were uncovered of a building 30'-2" wide and 86'-6" long with its narrow side facing Palace Green. The rear portion of the foundations was very fragmentary but the evidence produced by the excavating seemed very definite, none the less. These foundations were of a thickness usually conventional in Williamsburg as supports for a frame building of the period.

2. Levingston's House and Kitchen

Levingston caused to be built a house and a kitchen at the seme time as the playhouse or very nearly so. Much later in the century St. George Tucker moved the former Levingston House to become the nucleus of his own larger home nearby. In the present features of the Tucker House are therefore preserved a number of architectural features of the Levingston period. We thus have some rather definite clues to the character of exterior and interior detail of the Theatre itself since the builders would most probably 3 have employed the same molding planes and conventions of design in all three structures.

3. Alterations to the Theatre to be a Court House for the City

In 1743 after the group of "Gentlemen Subscribers" had given the Theatre to the City an advertisement for proposed alterations appeared in the Virginia Gazette, which, though brief, tells much about the playhouse. It is clear that the structure was of wood, roofed with shingles, that there were not sufficient doors or windows, that it was covered with weatherboards, and finally that a new floor was to be provided. Naturally, a theatre would not have enough windows for a court house, nor would the former door locations be suitable for the new use. But most important is the fact that a new floor was called for. The broken levels of a playhouse pit, boxes and stage would have to be changed in some degree to fit court house needs.

In this regard Mr. Southern pointed out to Mr. Frank a curious analogy between the Williamsburg Theatre and the one in Richmond, Yorkshire. The latter was preserved for many years after its use as a theatre by the Corporation of Richmond for possible conversion to a court house. Although this was never done, it is an interesting fact to consider. Apparently there was something about a theatre which lent itself to adaptation for court house needs. Mr. Southern attached considerable importance to this comparison.

4. Archaeology

Two cross walls were uncovered besides the remains of the outer foundation walls besides the remains of the outer foundation walls mentioned in (1.) above. These occur at important points. They are shown on the First Floor Plan of the accompanying sketches by the symbols W-W and W'-W'. Both walls are therefore at locations where they would be expected to stand in a proper theatre within the area defined by the outer walls — that is W-W falls on the line of the upper end of the pit slope at the front of the front boxes and main gallery, while W'-W' stands at the lower end of the pit slope.

On the other hand, no traces of walls appear under the lines of the side boxes and galleries. It is to be expected that this evidence would be present. The on1y explanation seems to be that these structural elements were without foundations of brick.

Are We Justified in Assuming a Proper Theatre?

1. Terminology

An impression of the theatre can be gained by listing contemporary references as mentioned in the report on the property by the Research Office of November, 1946 and Robert Land's article in the July, 1948 issue of the "William and Mary Quarterly" as follows:

a
"…To cause to be Erected & built … in ye City of Wmsburgh One good Substentiall house commodious for Acting Such Plays as shall be thought fitt to be Acted there."Agreement between Levingston and the Staggs, July, 1716.
4
b
"…together with ye bowling Green ye dwelling house kitchen & playhouse & all ye other houses outhouses & Stables…"Levingston's mortgage to Dr. Blair in 1721.
c
"Not far from hence [Bruton Parish Church and James City Courthouse] is a large area for a Market Place, near which is a play House and good Bowling Green."Hugh Jones, "The Present State of Virginia," c. 1722 as cited by Land.
d
"Williamsburg in Virginia, May 3, 1736. This being the Time of our General Court, the Town was last week filled with an extraordinary Concourse of Gentlemen and Ladies, who came hither to see our Governor Sister and Son, in company with one Dr. Potter. Apothecary Gilmore, Abraham Nicholas, a Painter, and several others, put Plays on the Public Theatre: And in Acting the Recruiting Officer, and Busy-Body, they performed their Parts with so much applause, that they have already got about One hundred and fifty Pounds Subscriptions to encourage their Entertaining the Country with the like Diversions at future Public Meetings of our General Court and Assembly. N.B. The terms of Subscriptions are that a Ticket will be delivered for every Twenty Shillings Subscribed.""The American Weekly Mercury," No. 869, August 26, 1736, as cited in the Report on the First Theatre, November, 1946 by the Research Office.
e
"The Lotts and Land whereon the Bowling Green formerly was, and the Dwelling House & Kitchen of William Levingston, and the House call'd the play House."Deed of December 4, 1745 wherein George Gilmer conveyed the property to the "gentlemen subscribers" as cited in the Research Report.
f
"…the Play House…" "… your present Useless House …" Petition by the city to the "gentlemen subscribers" that they give the theatre to the city for a courthouse as cited in the Research Report.
g
"… Play-House,…"Advertisement in the Virginia Gazette of December 19, 1745 for altering the theatre to a courthouse as cited in the Research Report.

5

2. The Vital Issue

Neither in the above nor in other known material is to be found specific mention that the structure was a proper theatre — that is, one with the conventional pit, boxes, galleries and deep apron stage. Nor do the foundations clear up the issue. But the sense of the material gets very close to the core of the matter in several instances. Under A-3 we note the new flooring for the courthouse and the implications involved. Under B-1-a we sense meaning in "One good Substentiall House." Under this same heading we wonder if it is reasonable to suppose that Levingston would build a structure 30'-2" by 86'-6" without the conventional playhouse arrangement or that he would send to England for actors and musicians to appear on its boards. Further, we doubt if Hugh Jones, an accomplished and meticulous gentleman, could mean other than a proper theatre when he referred to the "Play House" in "The Present State of Virginia" for, as in the balance of the above references, the term Playhouse was applied to the building and was customary parlance then for what we think of today as a proper theatre.

If the theatre was not a proper one, no one can say what shape it assumed. If it was a proper theatre, we can then justifiably turn to the highly conventionalized theatre form in England for guidance, about which much is known and of which there are important surviving examples.

3. The English Convention

A full description under this heading seems unnecessary when the matter has been so thoroughly covered by Mr. Southern in "The Georgian Playhouse." But a few of the more important facts might be set down.

When we think of the Theatre of 1716, we must turn first to the period of the Restoration in England when the theatre form of interest to us developed, persisting practically unchanged for many years thereafter.

These theatres were comparatively small and smallness meant a certain intimacy between the actors and the audience and, as Mr. Southern remarks. "This intimacy of the English theatre arose from the persistence of the native drama… Such a drama as the British produced is lost in a great auditorium."

London was the theatrical center. Provincial theatres in Britain followed the form developed there. Theatres in the colonies also followed this convention as can be seen in descriptions of those in the mid­eighteenth century in America. With this in mind it seems safe to say that the Theatre of 1716 was shaped by the same stream of tradition.

It is fortunate for us that there exists a drawing in section of the Theatre Royal in Drury Lane designed by Sir Christopher Wren in 1674. In illustrations D and E is an adaptation of this drawing with 3 other reconstructed drawings based upon it — all taken from an article by Richard Leacroft in the "Architectural Review" of July, 1951. They show the house quite completely. In illustration F are a plan and a section of Covent Garden in 1732. These illustrations coupled with the views of the models of the theatres at Richmond, Yorkshire and King's Lynn show the basic form which has guided our designs.

The Design of the Different Architectural Elements of the Theatre Building

1. Forward

Our evidence is not sufficient to allow us to say that this 6 is what the Theatre of 1716 was like. We can only say that within the limits of the evidence before us, we can present a typical theatre of the period following the size indicated by the original foundations. Our consultant, Mr. Southern, also felt strongly that this point should always be kept to the front in the interpretation of the building to the public and among ourselves. (See also illustration A.)

2. The Exterior

The early theatres in America were often constructed of wood and, when mention can be found of outside color, were painted red. They were barnlike and as described in one instance "without outward ornament, and in its appearance no ornament to the city." [Philadelphia — see card 112]. Their severity in aspect came about quite naturally because the managers refused to spend a penny more than absolutely necessary in building them. In Appendix G is a picture of the outside of the Richmond, Yorkshire house which was constructed as a theatre. Although of masonry, if we imagine it built of wood, roofed with hand rived shingles and covered with weatherboards, we find a compelling resemblance to Williamsburg building forms — see illustration G.

In referring to sheets 6 and 7 of the sketches, this severity is apparent. Despite the fact that the Richmond Theatre was almost without fenestration, the Williamsburg climate would have made windows a necessity.

Beside the entrance doors would be lettered the words Galleries, Pit and Boxes, respectively. to direct playgoers to their places.

3. The Interior

a. General

An important feature disclosed by the foundations is that the theatre had no basement. Therefore, the whole fabric of the house was above the ground level. This fact is helpful. Turning to the longitudinal section on sheet 5 of the sketches, we see the vestibule level, the downward sloping floor of the front boxes and of the pit, the vertical rise of the front of the stage apron and the gradually rising slope of the stage floor. The slopes and relationships of these parts are all extremely conventional and are based on English precedent. This sectional line when considered in its relation to the stairs of the galleries and vestibule, to the ground floor where are the pit passages and to the ground level outside represents the solution upon which all the other elements depend and fall into their proper places. See also illustrations B, C, E, F.

b. The Pit Passages and the Pit

An interesting element now comes before us — the pit passages. These can be seen on sheet 1 of the sketches leading to the doors opening into the pit proper. This arrangement, so different from modern theatre custom, was conventional in the early English theatres. What transpired in these gloomy corridors during performances can only be left to the imagination.

The pit itself is a straightforward area having a stepped floor and continuous benches with narrow tops set 2'-0" from back to back. This spacing was conventional but is decidedly cramped when compared with modern usage. The benches were simply constructed of wood without backs or arms and were sometimes covered with cloth — usually green baize. Sheet 2 of the sketches shows the startling lack of aisles. The playgoers got to their places by walking on the tops of the benches or wriggling through the narrow spaces 7 between. The scene of an audience seating itself in the pit must have been one of magnificent turmoil.

The plans of Drury Lane and Covent Garden both show fan shaped pits with curving rows of benches. However, at Richmond and King's Lynn the pits were rectangular and the rows quite straight. The narrowness of the Williamsburg house in plan, as in the latter two instances, decided this matter.

c. The Side Boxes

Here we are following Richmond and King's Lynn — see illustrations B and C. The extreme narrowness of the side boxes can also be seen in Drury Lane and Covent Garden. The same type of benches as used in the pit are arranged in the boxes without aisles. Since seats in the boxes were preferred and were more expensive to take than others in the house, the bench tops were often covered with cloth and the back walls draped with stuff. The boxes on the stage or near it bore an intimate relationship with the actors, who for the most part played on the apron or forestage. The two boxes on the stage had rows of spikes on the front handrails to prevent this intimacy from becoming physical on the part of the audience.

The low partitions or divisions between the boxes extend only to the back of the front row as at Richmond. They are simply constructed of wood and are raked in plan to favor the sight lines.

d. The Front Boxes

The front boxes have depth with a fan shape in the arrangement of the bench rows and divisions in form somewhat modified when compared to Drury Lane and Covent Garden. The curving rear wall is to be noticed following simi1ar examples at Richmond, Yorkshire and Drury Lane. Lack of aisle space is once more apparent, see sheets 2, 4 and 5. Upholstery and hangings if used would resemble the treatment of the side boxes.

e. The Galleries

In this upper realm we follow the four theatres of precedent mentioned above. The benches ere arranged in long rows without aisles. They are of the same construction as those in the pit and boxes. A glance at sheets 1, 2 and 3 will show how the balcony stair ascends from its own entrance door and permits no access to the more expensive seats in the pit or boxes. The galleries are supported all around by posts in the manner of our English precedent but follow in their detail Virginia character. The Richmond Theatre is an important contributor because most of its box fronts, gallery fronts and supporting posts remain.

At this point our attention is drawn to the ceiling. It follows quite closely the system employed at King's Lynn raking up rapidly over the main gallery to accommodate sight lines for the "gods" on the upper benches. Over the pit it is level. At the sides and over the front of the apron it springs from the cornice by means of a pronounced cove. At a lower level it stretches flat across the area of the apron until it dies against the curtain line. The whole proscenium area is thereby given an emphasis by tieing in, architecturally, the pilasters flanking the apron. This feature no doubt aided the acoustics as well.

The posts just mentioned continue to the cornice at the side galleries but are omitted before the main gallery where the cornice and eave are left out to gain the necessary sight lines.

8
f. The Vestibules and other Subordinate Areas

On the ground floor: in accordance with our precedent the ground floor must include besides the area below stage a separate stair to the Gallery, another to the Vestibule on the first floor, a Pay Box and, of course, the Pit Passages. It is also to be noted that the managers rarely provided other than minimum circulation spaces but they were forced to provide enough control in order to collect the ticket money due them. The arrangement of these elements as dictated by the original foundations produces the solution shown on sheet 1 of the sketches. It was also found to be the most feasible of the various possibilities studied.

The foundations revealed an interior wall which is represented on the plan by the south wall of the pay Box. This occurred in a fortunate location in that it allowed the Pay Box to be placed strategically where it could serve the file of "gods" ascending to the Gallery by their own stair as well as control the people destined for their places in the Pit or Boxes. The space labelled Office is purely imaginary. Since Levingston was licensed to operate an ordinary in his house, he must also have purveyed refreshments in his Theatre — a practice quite usual in England. Perhaps this space may have been devoted to such a purpose. Could it have been that there were the headquarters for Williamsburg's counterpart of the orange girls? See frontispiece.

The floor of this general area was most likely paved with brick or composed of tamped earth.

On the First Floor

Here is minimum circulation space. See the plans of Richmond and Drury Lane in illustrations B and D, respectively.

9

THE AUDIENCE

There are many contemporary accounts of audiences in early English theatres. So vividly do they describe the subject that two are quoted here. They leave little more to be said.

"There are two theatres at London one large and handsome where they sometimes act operas, and sometimes Plays: the other something smaller, which is only for plays. The Pit is an Amphitheatre fill'd with Benches without Back-boards, and adorn'd with green cloth. Men of quality, particular the younger sort, some Ladies of Reputation and Virtue, and abundance of Damsels that hunt for Prey, sit all together in this place, higgeldy-piggeldy, chatter, toy, play, hear, hear not, farther up, against the wall, under the first Gallery, and just opposite to the stage, rises another Amphitheatre, which is taken up by persons of the best Quality, among whom are generally few men. The Galleries where of there [sic] only two Rows, are filled with none but ordinary people, particularly the upper one." (A European account of 1698 quoted by W. J. Lawrence in "The Elizabethan Playhouse," p. 142.)

"For a seat in the boxes you pay 5s., in the pit 3s., in the first gallery 2s., and in the second or upper gallery, 1s. And it is the tenants in this upper gallery who, for their shilling, make all that noise and uproar, for which the English play-houses are so famous. I was in the pit, which gradually rises, amphitheatre-wise from the orchestra, and is furnished with benches, one above the other, from the top to the bottom. Often and often, while I sat here, did a rotten orange, or pieces of the peel of an orange, fly past me, or past some of my neighbors, and once one of them hit my hat, without daring to look around, for fear another might come plump into my face.

"Besides this perpetual pelting from the gallery, which renders an English play-house so uncomfortable, there is no end to their calling out, and knocking with their sticks, till the curtain is drawn up… I sometimes heard, too, the people in the lower or middle gallery quarrelling with those of the upper one. Behind me, in the pit, sat a young fop, who, in order to display his costly stone buckles with the utmost brilliancy, continually put his feet on my bench, sometimes upon my coat; which I could avoid only by my sparing him as much space, from my portion of the seat, as would make him a foot stool.

"In the boxes, quite in a corner, sat several servants, who were said to be placed there to keep the seats of the family they served, till they should arrive; they seemed to sit remarkably still and close, the reason of which, I was told, was their apprehension of being pelted; for if one of them dares but to look out of the box, he is immediately saluted with a shower of orange-peel from the gallery."

(Moritz's account of the Haymarket in l785 as quoted by Hartley and Elliot in "Life and Work of the People of England," p. 25.)

A good summary of the subject by W. Macqueen-Pope appears in his "Haymarket," p. 20, "Playgoers in those days were not so squeamish. They did not expect comfort in a play house. It was as important that they themselves should be seen, as that they should see the show. Therefore the line of sight did not matter very much [He describes the audience crowding in.] Then, there would be a raising of quizzing glasses and a rapid survey of the new play house, with 10 remarks varied according to taste, and a more leisurely and painstaking survey of the boxes, to see who of the smart world was present. That was the all important thing. The fops and regular play goers wo0uld be occupying the pitt the latter crushing into the middle, for they wanted to see and hear the play. The outsiders were left to the ogling and perambulating young men about town, who came merely to show themselves off and to quiz the other playgoers." (He has reference to the little Haymarket erected in 1720.)

How closely a Williamsburg audience of the early eighteenth century would reflect its English counterpart is a matter of conjecture since no recorded description is known. But there are several contemporary descriptions of American audiences dating from the second half of the eighteenth century. For the most part they come from newspapers and were usually inspired by audience misbehaviour. There are also some general descriptions by writers on the early American Theatre but they seem to be based in turn on the newspaper material. Some of the writers point out a difference from the English audience in that the pit was restricted to men. So far, the present writer has been unable to find the authority for this statement. If it existed at all, it is doubtful if it applied to the Southern theatres since the reverse is mentioned by Eola Willis in "The Charleston Stage in the 18th Century." Other than this the character and manners of the audiences apparently resembled those in England. In a novel, "The Virginia Comedians or Old Days in the Old Dominion, edited from the mss. of E. Effingham, Esq." John Esten Cook described an audience in the second Williamsburg Theatre in some detail. It is not known what his authority, if any, may have been. The audience he depicts was like the customary English one except "The pit was occupied by well­dressed men of the lower class, as the times had it…" Could this be the elusive authority? If so, it is a rather weak historical prop!

Many accounts were made by playgoers in England and somewhat later in the American colonies of the presence of some of the members of the audience on the stage. They were an intolerable nuisance to everyone, particularly the players, as can well be imagined. It may be assumed that this custom prevailed in Levingston's playhouse equally to his annoyance but equally beneficial to his pocket. No matter how unwanted the seats wold be simple, loose benches or stools scattered about the fringes of the forestage.

11

The Design of the Stage; its Equipment and Related Elements

1. Forward

After the architectural design of the Theatre was settled Mr. Southern sent us his Preliminary Suggestions for Machinery and Scenery with some explanatory sketches and numerous references to published material on the subject. The following explanation therefore is based on his suggestions and later correspondence between us concerning them.

In this explanation it has not been attempted generally to quote precedent for every detail since this has already been so thoroughly covered in Mr. Southern's The Georgian Playhouse and Changeable Machinery. the correspondence between us, Theatre of 1716, Notes by S. P. M. and Index to Notes by S. P. M. and Bibliography.

At best a textual explanation of the design, placing and operation of the machinery and scenery is complicated. To simplify matters a general statement is made followed by a detailed description under headings arranged to relate to the sketches concerned in sequence.

2. General Description

The scenery is disposed according to the early 18th century English convention and consists of a series of wings and shutters pushed by hand to slide horizontally in sets of grooves. Above these are hung the borders — horizontal pieces joining the wings to produce the illusion of sky, trees, ceiling of a room, or whatever. Intermingled among them are the drops — painted scenes on cloth, which work on rollers and can be lowered to the stage affording added scenes. Above the stage is a working gallery, the fly gallery, roughly level with the borders. It continues around the sides and back of the stage. Again above this is a working floor, the grid, and over it are the drums which operate lines to raise or lower the borders and the cloud chariot. The drums are turned manually. Around them are wrapped the working lines which are usually counter balanced by weights rising or falling as the case may be in chimneys located between the studs of the framing of the side walls. The counter weights tend to reduce the manual effort required to turn the drums and also permit the piece being raised or lowered to remain without movement in a given position. The drops and curtain are handled by separate means.

The flexibility of the system is remarkable as is the fact that changes of scene in the old tradition occurred in full view of the audience since the curtain was raised at the opening of the performance and lowered only at its close. Another compelling feature in such theatres was the lack of separation of the audience from the actors and scenes by the abrupt division of the proscenium arch as pertains today. The apron and doors of entrance brought the actors out into the audience and the scenery was a continuation of the auditorium in considerable depth heightened by the use of elaborate perspective so popular at the time. There was a oneness about the whole system which produced a delightful total effect — not to be seen anymore and thus quite unfamiliar to modern playgoers except upon rare occasions.

3. The Orchestra

The orchestra is admittedly cramped as was usual in smaller theatres. 12 In our case 6 or 7 musicians could be accommodated with others in the Players' Galleries if needed or for special effects. Separate exits are provided leading to the space below stage.

Attempts on the part of persons in the Pit to invade the Orchestra and stage were a constant threat. Accordingly a row of sharp spikes was fixed to the top of the low portion in front of the Orchestra for protection. See frontispiece.

The kind of music racks and candlestands are well shown in illustration H but in our case there would not be room for a harpsichord unless the number of musicians was reduced.

4. On the Stage

a. The Apron or Forestage, Doors of Entrance and Players' Galleries

In the Elizabethan theatre the auditorium surrounded the platform stage on 3 sides and as Mr. Southern points out in The Georgian Playhouse

"…the players would perform in the auditorium, not, as ours do [to-day], before it.

Next we should see that in order to enter on this 'peninsular' stage, the players had to use doors at the back and on either side. So much did entrance through a door become part of the tradition of acting that doors were built as regular features upon the Georgian stage, and the actors for well over a century used these doors for their entrances and exits instead of — save on rare occasions — coming on through the scenery…

"Above the doors [Elizabethan] were two side balconies whence those frequent and refreshing scenes on two levels, which diversified the drama of the time, were played … So popular were these scenes between a player on the stage and one 'up aloft' that we find all through the Restoration drama, and into the Georgian, frequent examples of scenes from windows and balconies, which, though they were manifestly the windows and balconies of the building referred to in the scenery, yet were usually played in openings built into the proscenium which was, equally manifestly, part of the auditorium."

In the period of the Restoration these elements strongly persisted, although they were somewhat modified. The typical playhouse was now wholly roofed over and the stage altered to include full sets of completely changeable scenery employing all the arts of the current vogue of artificial perspective. It is this pattern which governs the design of Levingston's playhouse.

b. Floor of the Stage

A definite slope is given the stage which begins at the front and rises to a point just before reaching the #3 groovers where it assumes the horizontal to the back of the stage. Its purpose was, of course, to heighten effects of perspective. It also makes necessary certain adjustments to the bottom of operating doors occurring in the shutters or flat scenes in #3 grooves so that they may swing clear of the slope when opening inward. See illustrations E and F and Sheet 5 of the sketches.

The framing which supports the floor boards has also to accommodate the frequent traps and is such that the floor boards will run from front to back of the stage.

13
c. The Wings, Flat Scenes and Grooves

The First Floor Plan, see sheet #2 of the sketches, shows the location of the bottom grooves in which the wings and shutters, or flat scenes, are to slide. The #3 grooves allow a minimum of passage space, 2'-0", between them and the stair to the dressing rooms below stage. The other dimensions are indicated on the plan. The #3 grooves are composite consisting of 2 long grooves for flat scenes and 2 shorter grooves for the wings. The flat scenes are in two halves, each half being 6'-0" wide. The #3 wings are each 3'-0" wide. The long grooves terminate 2'-0" short of the center line on each side providing a 4'-0" gap without grooves so that doors in the flat scenes can be opened or closed. The longer units of the flat scene grooves in #2 and #3 are fixed to the stage floor. The shorter units of these grooves are removable being held in place by pegs in the bottom of the groove beds which engage holes in the stage floor arranged to receive them.

The #2 grooves are similar except that they provide for 3 wings and 3 flat scenes.

The #1 grooves are different in that they provide for 3 wings only which are 2'-9" wide instead of 3'-0" as for the wings of #2 and #3 grooves.

A wide entrance is provided between #1 wings and the curtain line. This is masked with a permanent proscenium wing "booked" as shown on the First Floor Plan and labelled "P". See also Section D-D, sheet #8 of the sketches.

The inner ends of the wing grooves #1, #2, and #3 touch imaginary lines converging at a vanishing point located on the center line produced 40'-0" behind the curtain line and commencing at points about 1'-0" inwards from each side of the proscenium opening. These are lightly indicated on the First Floor Plan. Mr. Southern writes of this in his letter of May 6, 1952. "The rule for arriving at this was a tricky and undecided matter. Andrea Pozzo in the English translation of his book on Perspective (Vol. 1. 1707) gives a recommendation for making the distance of the vanishing point behind the proscenium arch equal to the distance from the proscenium arch to the front box, and I have followed him in my reconstruction, but I am well aware that other designers had different views and the matter was never definitive."

For the arrangement of lines from the vanishing point affecting the heights of the wings, etc., see Section A-A (long section) sheet #5 of the sketches.

d. Lines of the Curtain and Fly Gallery

Broken lines shown on the stage area of the First Floor represent the curtain line running between the sides of the proscenium opening. At the sides and back of the stage they represent the projection of the fly gallery. These are raked back as they approach the curtain line to provide space for the booked proscenium wing. Ladders are shown at each stair in the back corners of the stage which give access to the fly gallery.

e. The Traps

The location of the 4 traps are shown on the First Floor Plan — the footlight trap, 2 corner traps and the grave trap. These are further explained under the Ground Floor Plan, sheet #1; Section A-A, sheet #5; Section D-D, sheet #3 and Section E-E, sheet #9 of the sketches.

14

SECTION A-A (LONG SECTION) SHEET #5

1. Machinery Below the Stage

See also Ground Floor Plan, Sheet #1; Section D-D, sheet #8 and Section E-E, sheet #9.

The mechanism of each trap is simple consisting of 2 upright posts well fixed between which moves vertically the elevating or descending platform. The movement of each platform is effected by rotating drums turned manually by metal cranks which wind or unwind the ropes which in turn pass over pulleys and are fastened to the platform. Each drum is equipped with ratchets to hold the platform in a given position if need be. Each drum is supported between vertical posts except that of the footlight trap which is supported on a carriage.

The purpose of the traps, except the footlight one, is to introduce or remove players from the stage, to provide the apparatus for grave scenes and mysterious spectacles of various kinds such as disappearances and appearances, etc. They were conventional appendages of the stage.

2. Machinery Above the stage

a. The Fly Floor or Gallery

As already mentioned this is a working gallery providing access to the grid floor above and the catwalk as well as opportunity to operate the multitudes of lines of the upper scenery and the curtain, cloud chariot, etc. From the narrowed ends of the fly floor near the proscenium, small sets of steps lead to another working space over the proscenium. In the area over the stage the bottom chords of the trusses as indicated over the auditorium have to be raised in order to provide clear space for the upper scenery and to support the grid and catwalk. Structurally, therefore, the fly gallery must be suspended from the trusses. See also sheets #8 and #9 of the sketches. The rail of the gallery must be a strong member since working lines are often fixed to it in a variety of ways during the operation of the scenery and the groove arms.

b. The Grid and Catwalk

As explained above the grid is a working floor supported by the raised bottom chord of the trusses. At right angles to the chords of the trusses are laid several pairs of lighter timbers (not shown on the sketches). The center pair coincides with the center line of the flying system. The next pair are each above the two outer lines called the "long" and the "short". If needed one or two other pairs are placed at the extreme sides of the grid to take the descending ends of the 3 lines as they go down to be tied off on the fly rail cleats. Wherever required wooden pulley blocks span the paired timbers to take the lines from below. The areas between the pairs of timbers are floored with spaced boards to give access to any pulley. In general the grid is a flexible affair capable of rearrangement to adapt its parts to the varying demands of different productions. This is because it is the intermediate area where the lines from the motivating force of the drums are distributed to raise or lower, pull aside or swing into place the different pieces of the upper scenery.

The catwalk provides an intermediate working space between the fly floor and the grid. It has many purposes and occurs at what is often a 15 rather crucially busy area above the #3 grooves. It is particularly needed in rigging the cloud chariot which can operate in front or behind it. Access is by short ladders at each end from the fly floor. It consists of a simple wooden platform suspended by iron straps from a pair of raised truss chords.

e. The Drums

The lower drums, of which there are 3, work the lines of the borders. They are rotated manually by means of endless ropes from the working area above the proscenium. They are made of wood and the long shafts are hollow in section to save weight and provide stiffness. They are supported at each end by beams let into the roof framing while the bearings in which the drums turn are of metal.

The upper drum is single being used to raise or lower the cloud chariot or to provide movement, for other special effects. In the south fly gallery is a small winch to turn the drum by one end of a line. Another is attached to a counterweight rising or sinking in a chimney in the north wall and 4 others work the chariot. The lower drums have similar counterweights disposed as needed in either side wall.

d. The Rain Machine

The rain machines copied from an early example at St. George's Hall (Theatre), King's Lynn, England, is composed of a long hollow shaft of wood, octagonal in section, mounted between two stationary uprights. A series of nails are driven in a spiral pattern with the ends projecting into the hollow part of the shaft over which run a quantity of shot as the shaft is tilted up and down, see-saw fashion.

e. The Thunder Run

This device, adopted from an original at the Theatre Royal, Bristol, England, consists of a rough open trough of wood open at the top and arranged as a simple switch back. A vertical sliding panel working in an applied rebate is located at the bottom while another is near the top which can be raised by pulling a cord connected to it over a pulley thus releasing the cannon balls. The balls roar down the first incline and switch back through an opening in the common walls to the lower run over some steps to cause claps of thunder. It is hard to imagine a more completely satisfactory source of illusion! See illustration I.

f. The Wind Machine

A separate wind machine is needed but as it is a simple movable prop, it is not shown.

3. The Scenery

See illustration J.

a. The Wings and Flat Scenes or Shutters

The wings, including the booked proscenium wing "P", and the flat scenes are of canvas mounted on wood frames composed of light members of scantling usually fixed together with typical mortice, tenon and peg joints. Diagonal and cross members are similarly joined to the principal members to afford stiffness to the piece. Where the wings or flat scenes have uneven edges representing foliage, objects, drapes or other projecting surfaces, thin boards are installed covered with canvas and cut to the needed profiles on which the scenery is then painted.

16

In connection with the wings and flats, Mr. Southern further suggests, "The heights of the wing grooves are governed by a line vanishing at the point 40'-0" behind the curtain line, and cutting the flat scene in the #3 grooves at its top, which is 9' high.

"The wing grooves in #3 are 2 to 3 in. lower than the flat grooves… Thus #3 wings are approximately 8 ft. 9 in. high; the #2 wings are approximately 10ft; the #1 wings approximately 11 ft. 2 in.; and the proscenium wings 15 ft. The flats in #3 are 9 ft. high, and the flats in #2. are approximately 10 ft. 3 in."

b. The Borders

As shown in illustration I and as proposed for the theatre of 1716, there are two kinds — arched and flat. Both are simply constructed of painted canvas evenly hung from a rigid wooden member to which the 3 lines from the grid are fastened. The arched borders are cut out of 6'-0" wide canvas except for #3 where each leg will be 1'-0" longer. The flat borders are made from 5'-0" wide canvas which allows for uneven cutting of about 1'-0" deep along the bottom edge to simulate the profiles of clouds, etc.

c. The Drops

A typical drop consists of a rigid member supported by lines from the grid. Suspended from this by pulleys are 2 lines which are wrapped around each end of a long roller 5" or more in diameter and made hollow for stiffness.. The lines are gathered over one of the pulleys and continue to the fly rail, or other convenient place, where they can be fastened. If the lines are let out the roller unwinds downward, if pulled up the roller winds itself upward. Also attached to the top member is the cloth on which is painted a scene. Like the ropes the cloth winds and unwinds on the roller. That the drops were not an unmixed blessing may be seen from the following which Mr. Southern cites in Changeable Scenery from a letter printed in The Era, October, 1893: "Sir: Now that the opening of new theatres — with their up-to-date improvements — is an event of almost weekly occurrence, cannot some steps be taken by managers, scenic artists, and master carpenters to relegate to the limbo of oblivion that still surviving remnant of Noah's Arkaeology the lumbersome, cumbersome act-drop roller? It is expensive to produce and unwieldy to use. It is a source of danger to hats and heads where it descends. It is a snapper up of unconsidered trifles' in the shape of hats, cloaks. and swords when it ascends. Even the train of a lady's dress is not safe from its boa­constrictor-like clutches; in fact, nothing is sacred to the act-drop roller. At a matinee a few weeks since a lady, while standing with her back to the act-drop fiend, had her train taken up in it, and the public witnessed an effect not advertised in the programme …"

d. The Curtain

Conventionally the curtain was of green baize without decoration. It can be pulled up out of sight as in Section A-A or left partly exposed as in Section D-D. As already mentioned it was raised at the beginning of a performance and lowered only at the end — a matter of some dispute between scholars in years past and one which still flares up momentarily from time to time. As the curtain is raised it festoons upward by means of a series of 6 vertical lines which pass through rings fastened to the curtain. The lines are gathered together and pass on to a small winch nearby in the fly gallery — not shown on the sketches.

e. The Cloud Chariot

The cloud chariot was an extremely conventional prop of the 17 early 18th century English stage. Its purpose was to lower a god-like or otherwise decorative figure from the heavens into the view of the audience or to whisk a player up into the heavens from the stage. The chariot, shown in more detail in Section E-E, sheet #9 of the sketches, is made up of a simple platform of wood supported on vertical iron stirrups at each corner fastened in turn to lines worked from the upper drum. At the rear of the chariot is a flat piece cut in profile and painted to represent clouds which is somewhat higher than the figure or figures on the platform. Another piece of clouds is fixed to the front of the platform but cut in lower profile so that the audience can see the figure. The upper drum is so placed that the chariot can be lowered in front of or behind the #3 grooves.

f. The Vision Steps

Between the #3 grooves and the fly floor behind is a set of low steps constructed of well framed wooden members called vision steps. They are designed to hinge at the front of the fly floor and to swing up out of the way when not in use. The fly rail will be raised at this point or be omitted. When lowered the steps would be supported by lines from the catwalk or grid above so that the #3 groove arms would not be subject to an added weight they could not bear. The lines would also be helpful in raising the steps to the unused position.

Above the #3 grooves are 2 upper back flats hung and sliding in a set of upper grooves fixed to the bottom of the catwalk framing. These flats, or shutters, can be pulled apart to reveal a vision. The figure or figures of the vision will sit on the steps as the sight lines of the auditorium preclude a standing position.

4. Other

a. Doors of Entrance and Player's Gallery

Although already explained one of the doors of entrance and a players' gallery are shown here in elevation. The door is a typical early 18th century 6 panel one with a full complement of hardware including a lock, keyhole and a sizable brass door knocker. The players' gallery has a balustrade with nicely turned vertical members.

b. Spikes

As in the case of the orchestra partition or barrier a series of spikes are installed along the front of each box on the stage.

c. The Tragic Carpet

The carpet was of green baize, laid on the stage floor where needed and was used for heroes to die upon.

SECTION D-D AND SECTION DIAGRAM, SHEET #8 OF THE SKETCHES

1. Section D-D

Note: A word of explanation is needed to indicate the scope of Section D-D as shown by its sectional line on Section A-A. This line, proceeding from bottom to top, rises on the auditorium side of the foot­light trap, moves upstage to the center line of the door of entrance and players' gallery above, ascends to the proscenium ceiling, returns to a point between the thunder run and rail machine thence proceeds upward through the roof.

18
a. The Footlight Trap

The footlight trap has been mentioned in part. It is shown here in elevation. The platform supporting the footlights is made up of boards like a long box for rigidity in its rather broad span between supports. The bottom board is heavier than the others and is cut out around the posts at the same time extending beyond them to take the working lines. The cutouts are closed off beyond the posts by battens nailed to the underside of the extensions. In this trap, as in the others, a strip of wood must be attached to the inner face of each post over the whole distance of the rise and fall of the platform. It will engage a slot cut into both ends of the platform to act as a runner to keep the platform steady during its movements. For a description of the foot­lights themselves see below under Lighting. The purpose of the trap was, literally, to lower the lights below stage or to raise them from below depending on the effects desired. When below the lamps could be tended without interference with the play or scene.

b. The Proscenium Opening

In the proscenium opening are shown 2 elements of the scenery — the curtain raised to a partly exposed position festooned on its 6 lines and part of the booked proscenium wings "P" which are painted to resemble decorative curtains pulled aside.

c. The Players' Galleries

The players galleries are shown in section. These are fully explained elsewhere.

d. The Rain Machine

The rain machine already explained is shown here in elevation with its working ropes; vertical supports on the bed braced by knees.

e. The Thunder Run

The thunder run, also in elevation, is indicated by broken lines.

f. The Drums

The 3 drums operating the borders are shown in elevation with their endless ropes including the beams, framed into the roof structure, which support the bearings of the drums. The upper or cloud drum is also shown.

2. Section Diagram

Note: On the left side of the center line are shown the wings with flat borders and to the right the wings with arched borders.

a. On the Left

The booked proscenium wing "P" and the partly exposed curtain are again shown. The curtain in this position can occur with the flat but not with the arched borders. The wings #1, #2 and #3 are shown and how the borders relate to them. Some idea can be gained from this diagram of the perspective resulting from the placing of the wings on lines converging at the vanishing point.

b. On the Right

On the right of the center line the fixed proscenium wing "P" remains in place. The curtain, however, is pulled up out of sight so that it will not interfere with scenes employing the high arched borders. The wings 19 repeat those on the left side but the borders assume quite a different character and introduce new elements. The first arched border, is shown complete as far as the center line. The 3 working lines from the grid are indicated and how they are moved by one of the drums. Another line to the same drum is shown attached to a counterweight in its chimney in the side wall. As the border rises the counterweight sinks and vice-versa depending on which way the drum is revolved. In order to show all 3 of the working lines the upper portion of this border is continued by dotted lines on the left hand side of the center line broken off just below the fly rail.

The counterweights are cast iron disks 2 or 3 inches thick having single slots from the center outwards. The required number for a given weight are slid onto a vertical iron bar fastened to a line at the top and provided with a bed or stop at the bottom.

When the arched borders are used the projecting upper arms of the grooves must be raised to prevent their intrusion upon the scene. The way is then clear to pull back the upper flats above #3 grooves to disclose a vision or other special effects or to leave them closed to expose the scenes painted on them.

SECTION E-E AND SECTION F-F, SHEET #9 OF THE SKETCHES

1. Section E-E

a. The Grave Trap

The grave trap is shown in elevation. The top and bottom of the platform are made rigid by cross bracing. The working lines, pulleys and drums are self explanatory.

b. The #1 Wings

The #1 wings are shown in elevation as they rest in their grooves. The upper groove beds are supported from the underside of the fly floor by braces and stiffeners. The wing grooves, as shown on the First Floor Plan, are twice as long as the wing itself which provides space to pull the wing out of the scene and to push the next wing in line into the scene. The pushing or pulling on and off is done manually and no doubt will require soaping of the grooves to facilitate the operation.

c. The Cloud Machine

On this section is shown the cloud chariot and its machinery already described above. To the left of the center line the platform is shown by solid lines with the front and back cloud pieces indicated by dotted lines. On the right the delineation is just the reverse. The winch operating the drum from the fly floor is shown, the 4 lines from the drum to the chariot via the grid and another line from the drum to the counterweight.

2. Section F-F

a. The Wings and Upper Groove Arm

At the left side of the center line are shown in elevation the #3 wings in the on and off scene positions as well as their upper and lower grooves. Also shown are the grooves of the #3 flat scenes or shutters and how the projecting upper groove arm is pulled out of scene when arch borders are to be employed. This is accomp1ished by hinging the arm to the fixed portion 20 of the upper grooves and raising the arm by a line over a pulley fastened to the catwalk and thence to a cleat on a special member of the fly rail. When in its down position the groove arm is further supported by a diagonal line to the fly rail. The fixed part of the upper grooves has added support by a vertical line to the catwalk. Because lower in height than the wings in #1 and #2 grooves the framing supporting the upper groove beds below the fly floor is more elaborate.

b. The Shutters in #3 Grooves

Mention has already been made of the purpose and character of the upper and lower shutters in #3 grooves. They are shown here in their on and off scene positions. The movable extension of the lower groove bed is shown while the upper groove arm is indicated in its down position. The projection of the shutters beyond the grooves in on scene position is apparent whereby a working door or other opening can be put in the scene if called for in a play.

c. The Catwalk

The catwalk appears in this section in elevation. The ladders at each end from the fly floor are indicated as are the metal straps supporting the walk from above.

THE STOCK OF SCENERY

Mr. Southern has suggested, provisionally, for the purpose of the sketches and report the following stock of scenery.

1. Flat Scenes for #3 Grooves

Note: All with optional upper sections

a. Palace Street based on the frontispiece in Changeable Scenery, by Richard Southern, see illustration K.

b. Palace Interior based on Thornhill's Arsinoe, Queen of Cypress Act I, Scene iii. See illustration L taken from a contemporary drawing reproduced, in Drama, Its Costume and Decor by James Laver, p. 186.

c. Landscape based on the peaceful scene in Salmacida Spolia. See illustration M taken from a drawing by Inigo Jones shown on pl. 20 of Changeable Scenery by Richard Southern.

d. Prison based on Hogarth's Beggar's Opera. See illustration N taken from Drama, Its Costume and Decor by James Laver, p. 192.

2. Flat Scenes for #2 Grooves

a. Garden based on Thornhill's Arsinoe Act I, scene i. See illustration O taken from a contemporary drawing reproduced in Drama, Its Costume and Decor by James Laver, p. 185.

b. Palace Arch based on pl. 32 in Changeable Scenery by Richard Southern. See illustration P.

c. Chamber with fire place based on contemporary prints. Not illustrated herein.

21

d. Chamber with door and window based on contemporary prints. Not illustrated herein.

Cloths

a. Cut tree based on Inigo Jones' drawing, not illustrated herein.

b. Wood as for a.

c. Cave based on Drottningholm and Hogarth's Perseus. Not illustrated herein.

d. Tent based on Drottningholm and contemporary prints. Not illustrated herein.

e. Street, based on Muster of Bays Troops or Harlequin Horace, taken from the Elizabethan Playhouse and Other Studies by W. J. Lawrence opp. p. 117, not illustrated herein.

Stock Wings (not illustrated herein)

a. Elaborate Columns6 based on contemporary prints
b. Plain Columns6 based on contemporary prints
c. Tree6 based on contemporary prints
d. Rock4 based on contemporary prints

5. Stock Borders (not illustrated herein}

a.Straight
Drapery3 based on contemporary prints
Sky3 based on contemporary prints
b.Arched
Architectural arch3 based on contemporary prints
Sky3 based on contemporary prints
22

LIGHTING

1. General Remarks

In general the lighting is by candles in various kinds of fixtures which are shown on the plans of the sketches in their locations, identified by numbers. The accompanying blue prints show these fixtures drawn at the scale of ¾" = 1'-0". The fixtures are also shown on the elevations and sections of the sketches but without their numbers. The precedent for the design of the fixtures is taken from examples in the collections of Colonial Williamsburg and from contemporary descriptions or prints of English theatres.

The stage lighting and no doubt that in the rest of the house was tended by the candle snuffer — a long suffering individual subject to rude remarks from the "gods" in the galleries when putting in an appearance. Though menial, his position was none the less important. He appeared often on the stage during scenes to manipulate the lighting for effects, to trim or replace flickering candles.

Contemporary accounts refer to the smoking up of the various exposed surfaces of the interior of the house as well as the scenery of the stage by the large numbers of burning candles and oil fixtures with exposed flames. From our own experience at exhibition buildings and restaurants it is easy to appreciate this problem in maintenance so greatly magnified in a theatre.

2. In the Auditorium

Quite at variance with modern theatre lighting practices the auditorium remains fully illuminated throughout the performance. See illustrations H, C and frontispiece.

The principal illumination of the auditorium comes from the branches spaced around the hall between the boxes and the galleries. Within the front boxes are hung small chandeliers while sconces are attached to the rear walls of the side boxes. Over the apron suspended on cloth covered ropes are 4 hoops of candles which light the area brightly but, as often remarked by contemporary playgoers, interfere with proper vision of the deep scenes from the galleries. The hoops can be raised or lowered from above but how this was handled remains in doubt nor is it shown on the sketches.

3. In Other Parts of the House Related to the Auditorium

a. Stairways

The stairways are illuminated with simple chandeliers and wall sconces.

b. Vestibule

The vestibule is illuminated by simple chandeliers.

c. The Passages

The passages are illuminated by small sconces.

23
d. The Pay Box and Office

The lighting of the pay box and office are not indicated.

4. At the Stage

a. The Hoops over the forestage

The hoops are explained above under Auditorium.

b. The Footlights

The footlight lamps are simple and are made of tin. Each lamp has a reflecting portion and an open trough for the oil although candles could be optional. The front of the trough faces the stage and is square in form. The rear is curved and extends upward to screen the flame from the audience and to reflect the light toward the scene. In the trough a cork disk floats on the oil and is pierced to receive a wick. It is possible that the outer surfaces of each lamp were painted in color leaving the inner surfaces bright.

c. Lighting in the Area of the Scenery

Generally speaking the lighting of the scenery of the stage is not brilliant. Mr. Southern suggests "I believe that lighting of the scenic part of the stage in a theatre of this date in a small town would have been quite remarkably dim. Here is an astonishing note from a MS on the Ipswich [England] theatre, from which I have taken the sketch of the footlight device — 'Before the introduction of Gas, the stage and House were illuminated by oil Lamps and Candles in the various rooms … Behind each of the front "wings" were placed three lamps and two behind the back wings, but none were in the borders'."

The disposition of the lighting units in this area is not shown on the sketches for the reason that they are rather constantly changing in position and number of flames during the progress of a performance according to the demands of the scenic effect. That flexibility must be a principal characteristic is obvious so that the lighting equipment is composed of a series of simple sconces in combinations with, perhaps, some special fixtures all of which can be arranged as desired to produce the variety of illumination required.

d. Below Stage

The lighting of the dressing rooms is not shown on the sketches. It would be composed of candlesticks and sconces arranged to suit the needs of the occupants as in the case of the pay box and Office.

e. Among the Trap Machines

In the working space certain sconce fixtures are shown. No doubt there would have been a few more portable ones in the form of lanterns for the mechanics to move about to suit their needs. These are not shown.

Sketches

Sketches

24
f. In the Upper Working Spaces

In the other working spaces — above the proscenium, on the fly gallery, catwalk and grid — both movable and stationary fixtures would be needed to light the sundry tasks performed there. These have not been shown on the sketches.

25

NOTES ON INTERIOR COLORS AND FURNISHINGS

1. The Scenery

a. The Curtain

As mentioned the curtain is of green baize.

b. The Booked Proscenium Wing and Border

Mr. Southern has this to say about the colors of the proscenium wing and border "… In fact they seem to have been traditionally red in later periods, although Hogarth shows them as a sort of blue-green in his Beggar's Opera painting. The curtain itself was of course green. I think it might be interesting to consider breaking away from the later custom and making our wings and border here of blue-green painted drapery with gold fringe …"

c. Balance of the Scenery

The painting of the other scenery must be a matter of future study. It is apparent that much added research plus considerable experimentation will be involved depending on the quality of the lighting effects.

2. The House Except the Stage Beyond the Curtain Line

a. The auditorium

The woodwork of the Auditorium with the exception of the floors will be painted a medium light green with accents picked out in lighter and darker tones of this color and in gold here and there — particularly at the sides of the proscenium or forestage. The benches throughout will be of natural wood finish as will be the wood floors. The plaster walls and ceilings will be whitewashed but the proscenium ceiling will be painted to imitate raised ornament in several colors. Any decorative painting, as on box fronts, will likewise simulate ornament in relief. The chief concentration of decorative painting will be at the proscenium where it was conventional to have some show. The back walls of the boxes will be hung with cloth of a color between pink and crimson — preferably a moreen well watered. The side galleries or green slips will have green cloth hung on the walls. The panel molds of the gallery fronts might be merely painted realistically as was so successfully done at the Richmond, Yorkshire theatre. The inside face of box and gallery fronts, however, will remain in a natural wood finish. The combination of the bright red moreen and the green tones of the painted surfaces will produce an effect of the utmost charm heightened by the glistening branches and the accents of gilded and painted ornaments.

b. Stairs, Vestibules, Passages, etc.

There w1ll be no painting other than the whitewash on plaster work in general. The doors might be an exception.

26

MISCELLANEOUS

1. Capacity of the House

a. General Remarks

The managers whenever possible overcrowded their seating to get the added admission money. We can safely imagine that Levingston would seek the extra shilling as avidly as his brethren in England. Accordingly the capacity of his house is figured on the basis of 18" of seat width per person.

Seats in the pit6 benches @ 13 persons =78
5 benches @ 9 persons =45
123123
In the Side Boxes2 benches @ 22 persons =44
10 benches @ 4 persons =40
8484
In the Front Boxes12 benches @ 4 persons =48
6 benches @ 3 persons =18
6666
In the Main Gallery6 benches @ 17 persons =102
2 benches @ 16 persons =32
2 benches @ 15 persons =30
164164
In Side Galleries2 benches @ 22 persons =44
2 benches @ 25 persons =50
9494
Total:531
Guess Extra:130
661

Note: This total does not include playgoers on the stage or standing at the head of the gallery stairs, on the pit stairs and in the passages to the front and side boxes which must have occurred. The number would be anyone's guess. A figure of 130 persons is suggested, giving a grand total of 661.

b. Admissions

Unfortunately we have no record of Levingston's scale of admission charges. However, we do have those for a typical performance in the Second Theatre at Williamsburg of 1751; boxes 7s 6d, pit 5s 9d, gallery 3s 9d. The usual scale in London is said to have remained fairly constant during the 18th century at boxes 5s, pit 3s, gallery 1s, although provincial theatres often had lower scales as shown below for Richmond. If the Second Theatre rates are thought of in terms of Virginia currency the sterling equivalent the legal rate of exchange would be approximately boxes 6s, pit 4s 3d, gallery 3. It 27 can be seen, therefore, that the Virginia theatre was somewhat more expensive to attend than the exchange would justify.

Figuring Levingston's capacity at the above rates the total receipts for a full house of 150 places in the boxes, 123 in the pit and 258 in the galleries are 139£.19s.19d or 140£ in round figures.

Mr. Southern has given us some figures on the Richmond, Yorkshire theatre. It is considerably smaller than Levingston's house, having an auditorium approximately 25' wide by 25' deep whereas Levingston's is about 29' wide by 46'. He says "…Richmond is small, but it was said to house 'near 40' at 3/ boxes, 2/ pit and 1/ gallery. I cannot see any more than a total of 263 allowing modern standards of comfort. But this gives only £24.15.0. (81 boxes, 70 pit, 112 gallery.) To get near the specified figure we have to add 50% seats to each part of the house — which is incredible crowding, but that is what they seemed to do. The dim light, the overcrowding and the general manners must have explained something of the reputation of the Georgian theatres!

"Bristol [England — a surviving theatre of mid-18th century] holds somewhat under 700 to-day, therefore I suppose that if Williamsburg stood somewhere between Richmond and 18th century Bristol in population your seating capacity is not unreasonable."

c. Control and Sale of Admissions

Again we have no record of how Levingston managed his admissions. In England playgoers were admitted by tickets or by odd money. (See Theatre of 1716. Notes by SPM) Tickets were often crude brass checks about the size of a 25¢ piece. They bore no seat number nor were the seats in the auditorium numbered. The checks were good for all parts of the house well into the 19th century. Special occasions or benefits were honored with printed tickets. When admitted for cash, refunds were made to early leavers or the prices reduced for late comers. Well-to-do people usually sent servants well ahead of time to occupy their master's seat or seats which they gave up to their master upon his arrival — otherwise it was first come first served. From American accounts of the mid-l8th it appears that admission by ticket was the favored method put on sale in taverns or at the playhouse itself at certain hours. The shortage of currency and the customary American manner of dealing by barter, commodity script or credit may have made it necessary to sell tickets in advance at taverns or places where such transactions could be accommodated conveniently with money scales at hand to compute the value of foreign coins.

2. Advertising

a. Methods

In both England and America it was customary for members of the company to circulate in a town passing out playbills and crying the performance. In England this was usually done by two players, one a drummer and the other a trumpeter. Sometimes the whole company would parade. Presumably this 28 this custom came to America. In any case it is certain the actors distributed handbills in person so that it is difficult to believe they would not have introduced a little ballyhoo to attract attention. This method of advertising by handbills, some of which would of course be posted, explains the lack of theatrical news in the newspapers which causes such difficulties for modern students of the early theatre.

Whether posted or passed by hand the playbills always carried the words Vivat Rex at the bottom.

3. Stage Attendants

a. The Prompter

In England the prompter was descended from earliest theatre custom and placed himself at the first entrance on the actor's left hand. This side was therefore called the "prompt" side and the opposite side "O.P." His primary duty was, of course, prompting but he also was armed with a bell, a whistle and a wand which he used "to direct movements on the stage and changes of the scenery and, by a blast from the whistle, the raising or lowering of the curtain. It appears that his counterpart was to be found on the American stage — whistle and all.

b. Stage Hands

The stage hands, if they were to be visible to the audience in carrying out their various duties, would be dressed in green livery.

The following memorandum of November 4, 1955 replaces the section Modifications pp. 29 through 32 of this report. It represents in brief the results of a series of meetings and communications with Chief Fire Marshal C. S. Mullen, Jr., of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the formal approval of the State Corporation Commission for the construction of the First Theatre issued on April 5, 1955.

November 4, 1955
To: Files
From: S. P. Moorehead
Re: The Playhouse (First Theatre)

The following notes are set down for the convenience of those concerned with the project.

If the theatre is used as an operating one the number of seats will be distributed as follows according to the latest calculations:

Pit82
Side boxes30
Front boxes60
Gallery99
271

The following lists show compromises with authenticity, that is with the design as displayed by the model and the sketches, for the theatre as an exhibition building without performances and as an operating theatre.

EXHIBITION BUILDING

  • 1.Omit winders on all stairs.
  • 2.Sprinkler system throughout.
  • 3.Widen the stairs to vestibule of the boxes and to the gallery 4 inches and provide handrails on both sides of each in lieu of single handrails.
  • 4.Widen the stairs from the stage to the area below and install handrails as in (3).
  • 5.Omit benches, steps, and partitions of the south side boxes and make this area a corridor.
  • 6.Move the north wall of the office south 3 feet.
  • 7.Move the south window and door of the pay box east.
  • 8.Install steps to the ground with handrails at east stage door.
  • 9.Install a minimum amount of auxiliary lighting as inconspicuously as possible.
  • 2
  • 10.Provide a fire stop partition in the attic on the vertical line of the front of the stage.

OPERATION THEATRE

  • 1.As in (1) above.
  • 2.As in (2) above.
  • 3.As in (3) above.
  • 4.As in (4) above.
  • 5.Omit the rear benches in the side boxes.
  • 6.Install hinged flaps for the benches in the pit to provide 2 side aisles.
  • 7.Ditto for gallery.
  • 8.No candle flames or other naked flames will be allowed.
  • 9.Provide fire doors with automatic closers at the stair wells to the gallery, boxes and stage. These doors have to be a minimum of 1-¾ inches at the thinnest point.
  • 10.As in (6) above.
  • 11.As in (7) above.
  • 12.Provide panic hardware on all exterior exits. Provide Exit signs but authentic illumination will be permitted but not candle flames.
  • 13.As in (8) above.
  • 14.Omit dressing rooms exhibit. This space will become a green room.
  • 15.Provide a sub-basement under the whole building and add doors thereto under the stairs to the vestibule of the boxes and in the green room.
  • 16.Provide an asbestos roll curtain just behind the main curtain flanked by roller metal curtains from each end of the opening to the outer walls.
  • 3
  • 17.As in (10) above.
  • 18.Provide a storage space approximately 20 by 40 feet just east of the theatre, with a concealed entrance, for scenery, props etc.
  • 19.It will be necessary to provide auxiliary electric lighting on the stage and in the stage end of the auditorium. Some of the stage lighting cannot be concealed from visitors on stage when the theatre is displayed as an exhibit.
  • 20.It will be necessary to have a certain amount of auxiliary electrical equipment for operating the stage machinery.

S. P. M.

Copy to AEK, MAW
Cir. Copy to MEC, EMF
Cir. Copy to ELP, JFJ
SPM:dlm
* underground (revised June 14, 1956. SPM.)

29

Modifications Required by Law and Alternate Schemes to Accommodate Them

1. General

Besides our own study of the Virginia Fire Safety Regulations, meetings have been held with the Chief Fire Marshal of the Commonwealth of Virginia who has reviewed the sketches, discussed them with the Architects' Office and written a summary of his opinions wherein he interprets the application of the Regulations as they apply to our problem. In some cases they are not at all favorable.

Even if there were no fire laws the Architects' Office could not recommend the use of the building by the public without certain modifications for safety.

There appear to be 4 possible schemes:

  • 1.To design, build and use the building for public performances with 18th century type of scenery and machinery. Toilets and other facilities such as heating and ventilating equipment would be included in hidden spaces.
  • 2.To design, build and use the building with the stage area behind the curtain line arranged to produce authentic scenic effect by perfectly modern means. Areas below stage and above, since not visible to the audience, would be used for added stage needs. As in #1, toilets and other facilities would be provided.
  • 3.To construct the building purely as an exhibit without putting on performances. Facilities would be as for #1.
  • 4.To construct the building so that performances authentically staged could be simulated by moving pictures thrown upon a screen in the proscenium opening or behind it from an unauthentic booth in the main gallery or behind the screen at the rear of the stage. Facilities would be as for #1. It is possible a scheme could be developed combining #3 and #4.

The sketches presented in this report represent the 18th century form of the theatre. Sketches have not been developed for the above 4 schemes pending a decision by the Administrative Officers in principle favoring one or another.

2. Modifications if the Building is Used as an Operating Theatre (scheme #2)

Note: The numbers shown refer to sections of the Virginia Fire Safety Regulations, Revised February 21, 1950.

a. Type of construction for Categories #1 and #2 (operating theatre)

The building will have to be of semi-fireproof construction (section 302) which can be accomplished without appreciable loss of authenticity. The building is classified as a 3 story structure not to exceed 35'-0" in height.

30
b. The Floors and Stairs

The ground floor, main or first floor and gallery are considered separate floors. Each floor having a capacity for 100 or more people must have exits discharging directly to the outside (section 401.) The gallery and ground floor meet the requirements but the first floor does not. The letter can be revised without undue loss of authenticity. It is also to be noted that no winders were permitted on stairs. All of the stairs shown on the sketches must be revised in this respect.

Every such space must have 2 exits each served by a stair if stairs are necessary. Thus another stair must be provided for the gallery and another for the main or first floor which can only be accomplished by an exterior stair serving both. Further, an outside stair will have to be of incombustible material. Here, then, we encounter a serious compromise with authenticity. It is true that outside stairs were sometimes used in early English theatres but if so there were no inside stairs to the same space.

On the ground floor it may be that added exits should be provided through doors in the exterior walls opposite the doors to the pit. If so this can be accomplished by making hinged panels in the weatherboards without undue loss of proper appearance.

Some revisions will be necessary to the existing stairs even if an outside stair is added. They must be 44" wide (ours are 40") between walls and of incombustible construction (section 404.) They must have 2 hand rails which would not be authentic but the width can be adjusted with propriety. They must be enclosed and have no openings other than "necessary doors." Thus at the ground floor entrance to the gallery stair the pay box window and door must be eliminated or arrangements made for automatic closers on fusible links either of which can be done. The stair from the ground floor to the main floor must be enclosed with fireproof construction as must all stairs. This can be done by closing off the corridor to the pit passages on the ground floor with a fireproof door operated by an automatic closer on fusible links plus another enclosure and door at the top of the stair on the first or main floor. These revisions are within the limits of propriety. On the ground floor the other pay window presents a problem as mentioned above. It would not be advisable to eliminate it and no doubt special permission would be necessary to employ a fireproof panel on fusible links.

c. The Exit Doors

The audience exit doors must be 3'-8" wide. The concealed pit doors and the stage doors must be 3'-8" wide (section 411.) The They must be fireproof and swing out. Such revisions can be made. In the case of hardware panic bolts or panels are required. A compromise here may be possible with special permission. Exit signs, directional signs and artificial lighting must be provided for the first two elements of which would be ugly and completely unauthentic (section 412.)

d. The Seating

Since the Theatre of 1716 had no aisles the seating presents a serious note of unauthenticity. The seating as shown on the sketches is based 31 on 18" laterally per person with backless, armless benches set 24" from back to back. The law requires a minimum width or seat of 18" set not less than 30" back to back. The seats must be fixed with arms and backs. The maximum number of seats in a given row between aisles is 16 and from an aisle to the wall it is 8. In the pit there must be a center aisle and a cross aisle between the top landings of the pit passage stairs which must be 34" in width. In the side boxes the back bench will have to be omitted and an aisle provided for each box. In the front boxes aisles will have to be provided as well. In the main gallery a center aisle and a cross aisle are required as are aisles in the side galleries. The longitudinal or center aisles must be at least 44" wide and cross aisles at least 34" (section 801.) Such concessions if made would be a serious loss to the correct character of the auditorium.

Computing the capacity of the theatre upon these requirements we get:

Pit80
Front Boxes45
Side Boxes30
Main Gallery116
Side Gallery36
Total307
For comparison the capacity of the auditorium of the present Reception Center is 400.

e. The Stage and Related Elements

The stage must be separated from the auditorium by fireproof partitions and doors or openings in them must seal themselves automatically (Section 801.) This barrier must extend from the foundations to the roof. It would mean the addition of a fireproof partition with fire doors in the basement, at the stage end of the players galleries and in the roof space above the front of the proscenium ceiling. All horizontal areas between these partitions must be fireproof to provide a continuous baffle. This would introduce unauthentic features only in scheme #1.

The curtain must be of incombustible material mounted on a rigid steal frame riding in steel slots at each side of a minimum depth of 12". It must overlap the top of the proscenium opening by 2'-0" and by 18" minimum at each side. When raised the curtain must lower automatically in case of fire. It is obvious that our theatre cannot accommodate this feature without a rectangular tower some 22'-0" wide rising about 2'-0" above the ridge of the roof. This creates an impossible situation unless permission can be procured to run the curtain downward in a shaft in such a way that if fire occurs it will be raised automatically to close the proscenium opening.

Over a stage there must be smoke ventilators or a tower of metal with shutters which open automatically and instantly in case of fire. It must also be possible to open these manually. They must have a total clear area of 1/8 the area of the stage or, in our case, 92 square feet. It may be possible to satisfy the code by putting a series of panels hinged to fall outward in the east or stage gable since there are approximately 154 feet of surface available. The shutters would have to be fireproof — possibly on the outside made of metal 32 shaped to resemble weatherboards. However, this solution would need to be submitted to the Fire Marshal for approval. If not feasible, the situation would be impossible because the alternative would be a massive fire tower protruding above the roof.

Doors in the outer stage walls must be fireproof and self closing. All other doors must be similarly equipped. The windows in the outer stage walls will have to have self closing shutters inside. This presents difficulties for scheme #1.

The dressing and other rooms must be of fireproof construction including the doors. Exits from these spaces may be common but must be separated from the stage or other spaces by fireproof partitions and doors. The stairs must be separated in the same way and will have to be at least 3'-O" wide with no winders. This will encroach on the work area of the stage but can be handled.

No combustible scenery material of any kind will be permitted in the area of the stage and, of course, the use of candles or any flame exposed lighting fixtures is forbidden anywhere in the house. The stage must have a sprinkler system. This would have considerable effect on scheme #1 and some on scheme #2.

There are several regulations governing the design of heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems but they do not appreciably affect the appearance of the theatre.

f. Other Objections

Other objections may come to light upon completion of working drawings of the favored scheme since the Fire Marshal's office obviously cannot give final interpretations or approvals on the basis of preliminary drawings of a project when in the form of sketches.

3. Modifications if the Building is Used Only as an Exhibition Building (scheme #3)

If the theatre is used only as an exhibit all the above items would apply except for the use of panic bolts, seating and aisle restrictions and the stage restrictions. not entirely clear - needs explanation. [illegible]K 5/29

4. Modifications if the Building is Used for Moving Pictures But not Theatrical Performances (scheme #4)

The modifications for Scheme #4 would be as for scheme #2 except for stage restrictions and the rules governing the construction of projection booths.

RR028804 Ground Floor Plan

RR028805 First Floor Plan

RR028806 Gallery Plan

RR028807 Sections C-C and B-B
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

RR028808 Section A-A
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

RR028809 South Elevation
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

RR028810 West and East Elevations
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

RR028811 Section D-D
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

RR028812 Sections E-E and F-F
Scheme 3 — Final Sketches

Illustration A
Memorandum from S.P. Moorehead to B. W. Norton of December 31, 1947.

December 31, 1947

To: Mr. Norton
From: S. P. Moorehead
Re: First Theatre Report

Attached are four copies of "The First Theatre and its Site — A Summary of Facts Including New Evidence," dated December 1, 1947, which I prepared to cover briefly the various data concerning the problems to be met in reconstructing the First Theatre including a review of the means by which earlier conclusions were reached and the new evidence recently brought to light. In this report no attempt was made to list recommendations for the reconstruction of the First Theatre. Mr. Chorley has read this report and has asked me to draw up recommendations for submission to the officers of Colonial Williamsburg. Accordingly, I am listing these recommendations for the future reconstruction of this building.

Mr. William G. Perry of the firm of our consulting architects, Perry, Shaw and Hepburn, read the report and discussed it with Mr. Kendrew and me on his last visit. The various recommendations have his approval.

It is proposed that the First Theatre be reconstructed, furnished appropriately and as authentically as possible and that it be made an exhibit. As mentioned in the report there are certain limiting factors which must be given consideration, the most important of which is the fact that we have little information about the design of the structure. Whatever form the design might take would, therefore, be hypothetical although it would depend on known facts concerning the arrangement and operation of small theatres in eighteenth century England and America. Since both design and operation of theatres at that time were highly conventionalized, it would be possible to support the design and details, operating devices, etc. in a reasonably stable manner. But even so, it must be admitted that the design would be manufactured almost completely on supposition.

It is further recommended that the Levingston House not be restored. The Levingston Kitchen could be revised to its earlier form, but it would appear wiser to leave it as it is including the west side of the Tucker Coleman property.

Fortunately, the First Theatre, if reconstructed, would be as far distant from the main house as possible on the lot. The bowling green might well be reconstructed, but the balance of the Tucker lot would be of the period of the Tucker House. This would not preclude, however, reconstructing the Levingston House and altering the Levingston Kitchen and revising the landscaping on the west side of the Tucker Lot if the need for doing so arose in the future. It is also recommended that the reconstruction of Gilmer's Apothecary Shop not be done. Although here again this possibility would not be ruled out for the future.

S.P.M.

Illustration B

Model of the interior of Richmond Theatre Yorkshire with a plan and section reproduced from Theatre Notebook, issue of October - December, 1949.

Model and sketches from Theatre Notebook [Model and sketches from Theatre Notebook]

Illustration C

A model of St. George's Hall Theatre, King's Lynn, England, prepared under the direction of Mr. Southern after internal evidence in the building. Note the wind machinerain? above the proscenium.

Model of St. George's Hall Theatre, King's Lynn, England [Model of St. George's Hall Theatre, King's Lynn, England]

Illustration D

A perspective of the interior of Drury Lane Theatre, London, in 1674 from Wren's Drury Lane, an article by Richard Leacroft in The Architectural Review of July, 1951.

A perspective of the interior of Drury Lane Theatre, London, in 1674 [A perspective of the interior of Drury Lane Theatre, London, in 1674]

Illustration E

Plan, section and isometric drawing of Drury Lane Theatre, London, England in 1674 from Wren's Drury Lane, an article by Richard Leacroft in The Architectural Review of July, 1951

Plan, section and isometric drawing of Drury Lane Theatre, London, England in 1674 [Plan, section and isometric drawing of Drury Lane Theatre, London, England in 1674]

Illustration F

Plan and Section of Covent Garden Theatre, London in 1732 from Parallele des Plans des Salles by G. P. Dumont, 1763, after a photostat by the Congressional Library. On the scale at the bottom of the print the word "Tois" equals 6 French feet or 6 2/5 English feet.

Plan and Section of Covent Garden Theatre, London in 1732 [Plan and Section of Covent Garden Theatre, London in 1732]

Illustration G

An exterior view of the Richmond Theatre, Yorkshire, from The Georgian Playhouse by Richard Southern.

RR028818 The Theatre at Richmond, Yorkshire, 1788

Illustration H

The "Fitzgiggo Riot" at Covent Garden Theatre in 1763, taken from an original print in the possession of Colonial Williamsburg.

The "Fitzgiggo Riot" at Covent Garden Theatre in 1763

Illustration I

The thunder run at The Theatre Royal, Bristol, England built 1766 and still surviving with many of its original features.

The thunder run at The Theatre Royal, Bristol

Illustration J

Model of the working of the English groove system by Mr. Southern taken from plate 39 in his Changeable Scenery. The model is of a section of the Theatre Royal, Bristol, England. The chief difference between it and our theatre is in the location of the drums. In Levingston's playhouse the drums were placed above the grid, here they are in one of the fly galleries.

Model of the working of the English groove system [Model of the working of the English groove system]

Illustration K

A Palace Street. Reproduced from an unidentified water color in the Burney collection, British Museum and taken from the frontispiece in Mr. Southern's Changeable Scenery. The color as shown in the frontispiece is indicated on the print in crayon.

A Palace Street [A Palace Street]

Illustration L

A Palace Interior from Thornhill's Arsinoe, Queen of Cyprus, Act I, scene 3 reproduced in Drama, Its Costume and Decor, London 1951 by James Laver on p. 186.

Palace Interior from Thornhill's Arsinoe, Queen of Cyprus [Palace Interior from Thornhill's Arsinoe, Queen of Cyprus]

Illustration M

A landscape (Peaceful Scene) from a drawing by Inigo Jones reproduced in Changeable Scenery by Richard Southern, pl. 20.

A landscape (Peaceful Scene) [A landscape (Peaceful Scene)]

Illustration N

A Prison scene from Hogarth's The Beggars Opera reproduced in Drama, Its Costume and Decor, London, 1951, by James Laver, p. 192.

RR028825 The Beggar's Opera from engraving by William Blake after William Hogarth

Illustration O

A Garden from Thornhill's Arsinoe, Queen of Cyprus, Act I, scene 1, reproduced in Drama, Its Costume and Decor, London, 1951 by James Laver on p. 185.

RR028826 151 and 152. Designs for stage scenery of 'Arsinoe, Queen of Cyprus': from the original drawings by Sir James Thornhill in the Victoria and Albert Museum

Illustration P

A Palace arch from a Hogarth print reproduced in Changeable Scenery by Richard Southern, pl. 32.

RR028827 32. Hogarth caricature showing typical scenery about 1723.