Wetherburn's Tavern Historical Report, Block 9 Building 31 Lot 20 & 21 Originally entitled: "Site of the Bland House"

Helen Bullock

1933

Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library Research Report Series - 1165
Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Library

Williamsburg, Virginia

1990

SITE OF THE BLAND HOUSE

1933 - Obsolete

The site of Williamsburg was Middle Plantation, and in gathering material on Williamsburg it has been our practice to trace all Middle Plantation land grants and deeds. Through this work we have determined the exact boundaries of the land of John Page, from whom the majority of land for the City of Williamsburg was purchased.

We have a survey of Page's land dated 1683, which covers most of the present site of Williamsburg, all of the present Duke of Gloucester Street fell within the Page grant at this time. There were houses on Page's land which stood in the middle of the new Duke of Gloucester Street (J.H.B., 1702-12, p. 55) which were ordered razed in 1704 "that the prospect of the street between the Capitol and Colledge may be cleer." He was paid £ 3 damages and the bricks were laid upon his lot. He was not paid for any other houses.

In 1683 all of Page's lands acquired from various owners from 1655 until 1683, were patented at the Land Office. This patent follows:

State Land Office
Book 7
Page 280 1683.
[Thomas, Lord Culpeper to John Page.]

... give and grant unto John Page Esqr one of his Maj his Councill, Three hundred and thirty Acres of Land lying in the Middle plantation of York County Bounded as foll: Two hundred and Eighty Acres part thereof beginning att a meare Stone that Stands in the Trench where the old pales stood on the north 2 Side of the Roade, that leads through the middle plantation towards James Citty, and from thence Running East by South one hundred poles to a marked white oake, thence East Eight degrees South, one hundred seventy two poles to a Corner Red oake, that Divides this land from the land of William Dyer thence North by East Sixty poles to a Corner Red oake, thence East nine degrees South, one hundred thirty three poles and a half to a meare Stone att the head of this Land, thence North by East Sixty two poles to a forked Poplar, thence West by North one hundred and Eight poles to a marked Hickory in a Valley, thence north-west westerly one hundred and sixty poles to a Corner of a Ditch, where ye old pales stood, thence South west five degrees, west one hundred poles to an old Poplar Stump, thence along the old pales trench South west Eight Degrees west one hundred fifty nine poles, to the place first Specified, one hundred Acres of the Said Land bought of Coll. George Reade, as by Deed appeared dated ye twenty fifth of June Sixteen hundred fifty five, and one hundred and ninety acres of the above said Land bought of William Newman, formerly belonging to George Lake Decd One hundred and fifty Acres of ye Said one hundred and ninety acres did Escheat to his most Sacred Majsty ye Sixth of May Sixteen hundred eighty-two, but by Survey now made found sold but two hundred Eighty Acres, Including in the Same ten Acres of Land belonging to Mr. William Sherwood, and Thomas Rabley, Two hundred and Eighty Acres part thereof being sold unto the said John Page Esqr ... as foll (Vizt) one hundred Acres by Pattent Granted to Lewis Burwell and Lucy his wife the thirteenth of October Sixteen hundred fifty two, being purchased by Majr George Read of William Bernard Esqr and Lucy his wife, heire to Capt Robert Higginson the twenty Eight of November Sixteen hundred fifty three, and by ye Said Read Sold to John Page Esqr... by deed June ye twenty fifth Sixteen hundred fifty five, and one hundred Acres of Land purchased by Thomas Lucas and Thomas Gregory of Capt Richard Popeley the first of February Sixteene hundred forty one, and by them sold to Thomas Heath, and by him Assigned to George Lake and George Wyat the twenty ninth of January Sixteen hundred forty three, and four hundred Acres being likewise purchased by ye said George Lake and George Wyatt of the Said Capt Richard Popeley by deed of Sale under his hand and Seale the tweleth of April Sixteen hundred forty two, and then the said five hundred Acres equally divided between ye Said Lake and Wyat, the one halfe being two hundred and 3 fifty Acres Granted by Pattent to George Lake ye fourth of October Sixteen hundred forty five, one hundred Acres of which land the said George Lake sold to John Moody by deed ye twenty eight of October Sixteen hundred forty six, and by John Moody assigned - sold to Nicholas Harryson ye twenty second of November Sixteen Hundred fifty one, and by Nicholas Harryson Assigned to William Newman The nineteenth of May sixteen hundred fifty two, and by William Newman Assigned to Henry Waller the seventeenth of January Sixteene hundred fifty two, and by Henry Waller Sold fifty of ye said one hundred Acres to John Maler in June Sixteen hundred fifty four now in the tenure of William Dyer and Reassigned the Deed to William Newman the fifty of September Sixteen hundred fifty Seven, and the said Newman Sold about ten Acres of ye said Hundred to William Plumtree now in the Possession of Mr William Sherwood, and Mr Thomas Rabley, And the Residue being one hundred and ninety Acres was Sold by William Newman and Priscilla his wyfe, to ye Said John Page Esqr ... by deed the twentieth of January Sixteene hundred Sixty nine, but ye Said George Lake dying without heire or will, one hundred and fifty Acres of ye Said Land was found to Escheat ... ye Sixth of May Sixteene hundred Eighty-two, and Granted to the Said John Page Esqr ... which sales of fifty Acres by Waller to Maler and about ten Acres to William Plumtree, being Excepted, there ought of Right and should have been two hundred & ninety Acres of Land due to the said John Page Esqr ... but upon an Exact Survey is found but two hundred and Eighty Acres, Including in the Same, the Land sold to Plumtree now in the Possession of William Sherwood and Thomas Rabley, And Also fifty Acres of land part of the two hundred granted by Pattent to Lewis Burwell and Lucy his wife The thirteenth of October Sixteene hundred fifty two lying and being without the old Pallisado att Middle plantation bounded northwest upon the land of Peter Efford now in Possession of Edward Malyn, along the Run of a Swamp, and South East upon the Pallisado, purchased by Majr George Reade of William Bernard Esqr and Lucy his wyfe heire to Capt Robert Higginson the twenty Eight of November Sixteene hundred fifty-three, and by ye said Reade sold to John Dickinson by Deed ye twenty fourth of September Sixteen hundred fifty five, and by ye said Dickinson Assigned to Abraham Spencer the tenth of December Sixteen hundred fifty five, and by Thomas Spencer Son and heire of ye said Abraham Spencer sold to John Page Esqr ... by deed the fourth of November Sixteen hundred fifty seven ...

4

We have platted the various units of the Page grant, as well as the entire Page patent of 1683 in Middle Plantation. We find no trace of any Bland lands within the Page grant, and are relatively certain no house would have been built by Bland on Page's lands in 1660, or on any of the lands of other owners which became Page's before 1683.

In 1699 Page was paid for the land taken up for the city, in 1704 he was paid for his old houses razed from the Duke of Gloucester Street. In 1705 the "Act directing the building of the Capitol & City of Williamsburg" was passed. The lots laid out in the Theodorick Bland survey of 1699 were confirmed again in 1705. (Hen. Stat. - Vol. 3, pp. 422-5; 426-431) exempting lots in Middle Plantation where houses were standing from being taken up by the proprietors of the city, specifying in this particular 4 lots owned by Benjamin Harrison which had some buildings on them.

Lots 20 and 21 on Duke of Gloucester Street were however, taken up by the proprietors for the City of Williamsburg and were assigned numbers in the town plan. The first deed to these lots in our records from York County was made May 23, 1716 by Richard Bland to Benjamin Harrison and was for lots 20 and 21, with all houses ... "where he lately lived."

Since the lots were part of the town plan they were probably numbered in 1699 or 1705 and Bland acquired them about that time. Not all deeds to Williamsburg property in York County are available, as residents of the city were privileged to record them at the General Court, which many did, and all the General 5 Court records were destroyed in Richmond during the War Between the States.

The later owners of the lots are known and the full chain of title for the 18th century is available. Washington mentions stopping in this tavern on a number of occasions when it was owned or operated by different proprietors. Among his visits to this house which can be authenticated are the following:

May 7, 1771 - Dined at Mrs. Dawson's & spent the evening at Anderson's.
Nov. 3, 1771 - Dined at Anderson's ...
Nov. 30, 1773 - Spent the Evening at Anderson's.
June 6, 1774 - Dined at Rich'd Charlton's & supp'd at Anderson's.
June 8, 1774 - Spent the evening at Anderson's.
June 13, 1774 - Spent the evening at Anderson's.
14, Spent the evening at Anderson's.
16, Spent the evening at Anderson's.
17, Dined at & spent the evening there also. [Fitzpatrick, John C. - editor]
Diaries 1748-1799, of George Washington

Harold R. Shurtleff, Director
DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH & RECORD
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG INCORPORATED

Report by: Helen Bullock
HB/vbl

November 13, 1933
Mrs. Virginia Haughwout
Richard Bland Tavern
Williamsburg, Virginia

Dear Mrs. Haughwout:

We are very interested in the Bucktrout family records which you so kindly loaned us, and are glad to be able to send you some additional items about Mary Bruce, very evidently the daughter of Jacob Bruce and his wife, Rachel.

In addition we have compiled records of the Bland-Wetherburn house in a brief abstract form. If you wish to have these copied fully again, we will be glad to have it done for you for a charge of 60¢ an hour. The Washington references to visits to your house are enclosed with notes on the house.

If you have a copy of a York County record which seems to point to the existence of the Bland house at this early date we would like very much to see it as it conflicts so definitely with an accumulation of many records that it is almost impossible to reconcile with known and accepted data. However, the record may explain away in some manner the evidence we have followed in accepting the date of the house as between 1699-1716 more probably between 1710-1716; in which case if would be a valued addition to our files.

Thank you so much for your interest in our records and for your loan of the interesting item on the Bucktrout family.

Very sincerely yours,

Harold R. Shurtleff, Director
Department of Research & Record

HB/vbl
enc: (2)

ANDERSON'S TAVERN

George Washington made the following references to Anderson's Tavern in his Diaries 1748-1799(edited by John C. Fitzpatrick):

May 7, 1771 - Dined at Mrs. Dawson's & spent the evening at Anderson's.
Nov. 3, 1771 - Dined at Anderson's ...
Nov. 30, 1773 - Spent the Evening at Anderson's.
June 6, 1774 - Dined at Rich'd Charlton's & supp'd at Anderson's.
June 8, 1774 - Spent the evening at Anderson's.
June 13, 1774 - Spent the evening at Anderson's.
14, Spent the evening at Anderson's.
16, Spent the evening at Anderson's.
17, Dined at & spent the evening there also.

George Washington made no reference to stopping at Anderson's Tavern until May 7, 1771 according to our record. This means that he did not stop at Anderson's Tavern when it was located in the northwest portion of the city on lots # 212 to 217 in the city plan

Anderson leased these lots to Cuthbert Hubbard and on March 7, 1771 advertised in theVirginia Gazette (edited by Purdie and Dixon):

March 7, 1771.

The Subscriber has taken the House lately occupied by Mr. Southall, where he hopes to be prepared, by the 2 ensuing General Court, for the Accomodation of Gentlemen. He returns Thanks to those Gentlemen who have formerly frequented his House, and hopes to merit a Continuance of their Custom.
ROBERT ANDERSON.

N.B. A single Man, well recommended, who understands the Business of a Bar, will have Employment by applying to me.

James Southall had just taken over the Raleigh Tavern according to this advertisement in the Virginia Gazette (Purdie and Dixon, eds.):

March 7, 1771.

The Subscriber, who has lately entered into the RALEIGH Tavern, begs leave to solicit the Customers of that House for a Continuance of their Favours, and he hereby acquaints the Gentlemen who lodged there in Publick Times that their Rooms will be still kept in Order to receive them. He flatters himself that he will be able to give Satisfaction; as no Pains nor Cost, shall be spared for that End.
JAMES SOUTHALL.

This means that Anderson took over Southall's former tavern which was not the Raleigh.

Collecting all the references to Anderson's Tavern in the Virginia Gazette it is possible to deduce that the tavern was located on Duke of Gloucester Street on Colonial lots # 21. The manner in which this can be done is as follows:

  • 1)Anderson did not move his tavern between 1770 and 1774 because he advertised throughout that period in the Virginia Gazette without announcing it.
  • 3
  • 2)Robert Bruce, watch and clock maker Advertised as follows in theVirginia Gazette (Purdie and Dixon, editors):
    June 2, 1774.
    ROBERT BRUCE, WATCH and Clock Maker, is removed from Mr. Craig's, at the Golden Ball, to the opposite Side of the Street, the House above Mr. Robert Anderson's, where he intends carrying on his Business, and will be much obliged to those who may please to employ him.
    July 21, 1774.
    ROBERT BRUCE,
    WATCHMAKER,
    At the House above Mr. ANDERSON'S Tavern, MAKES and REPAIRS all Sorts of WATCHES and CLOCKS, and will be much obliged to those who please to employ him. He returns his most grateful Thanks to his former Customers, and begs a Continuance of their Favours.

    ***WATCHES sent from the COUNTRY shall be done with Expedition, and returned with Care.

Mr. Craig the watchmaker at the Golden Ball was James Craig and his shop was located on colonial lot # 52 west of the Raleigh Tavern according to the following data:

Virginia Gazette- Purdie & Dixon, Eds.
October 1, 1772

JAMES CRAIG,
At the GOLDEN BALL,
WILLIAMSBURG,
Begs Leave to inform the Publick that ...
June 4, 1770.
York Record Book 8 - Deeds
Gilmer, George
Lucy, his wife
to
Hunter, Jane - Milliner
4 Consideration: 100 pounds.

All that part of a lot of land now in the possession of the said Jane, lying and being on the Main Street in the City of Williamsburg and denoted in the Plan thereof by the figures 52, and bounded on the West by the lot of the late William Prentis, Dec'd., on the South by the Main street, on the East by the brick shop now occupied by Dr. James Carter and by the lot of Mr. James Craig, and including one half of the stable and all the garden, and one the North by the lot or part of a lot belonging to Daniel Baxter. (Page 67)

Since James Craig was in the same block as the Raleigh Tavern and was on the North side of Duke of Gloucester Street Robert Bruce's advertisement is evidence that Anderson's tavern was in the first block of Duke of Gloucester Street from the Capitol and on the South side of the street since Bruce "removed from Mr. Craig's at the Golden Ball to the opposite side of the street, the house above Mr. Robert Anderson's."

All our records show that the terms above and below were used to mean west and east on Duke of Gloucester Street [Proof available but is very long.] This places Robert Bruce's shop west of Anderson's Tavern, so Anderson's tavern was not on the corner lot #20 in the city plan.

Continuing the process of elimination there was a large tavern on colonial lot #21 (now called the Richard Bland house). There are no records which fit this location except Robert Anderson's; since colonial lot #22 next lot east was Charlton's according to other records (see Data on Charlton's in separate report). It is possible to trace 5 the remaining lots in this block for the period 1771 to 1774 without finding any record of Robert Anderson.

Alexander Purdie the printer, moved to lot #20 in 1774 according to this advertisement in the Virginia Gazette

December 1, 1774.

…, and those in this City who incline becoming Subscribers will be kind enough to leave their Names at my Office, which is the House formerly occupied by Mess. Tarply, Thompson, & Co. on the main Street, and adjoins Mr. Robert Anderson's Tavern.
ALEXANDER PURDIE

The following deeds show that lot #20 was owned by Purdie.

September 17, 1782.
York County Deed Book VI.

Pride, James
James City County
to
Galt, John Minson ) Executors
Anderson, Robert (Alexander Purdie.
Consideration: 600 Pounds.

All that piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the County of York, on the Suke of Gloucester Street in the city of Williamsburg, bounded as followeth: On the North by the said Duke of Gloucester Street, on the East by the lot of Henry Nicholson, on the South by the Said Nicholson's lot and on the West by ----- Pump Street, being part of that lot or parcel of land denoted in the plan of the said city by the figures 20, which said piece or parcel of land was sold by Henry Wetherburn formerly of the City of Williamsburg to Messrs. Tarpley & Thompson, merchants of said city and by the said Tarpley and Thompson sold to James Pride. (Page 139)
6
September 30, 1782.
York County, Deed Book VI

Galt, John Minson ) Executors
Anderson, Robert ( Alexander Purdie
to
Beall, Samuel - Merchant, Williamsburg
Consideration: 3000 Pounds

All that piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of York, City of Williamsburg, being part of the lot or half acre of land denoted in the plan thereof by the figures or numbers 20, and bounded on the North by the Duke of Gloucester Street, on the East by the lot of Henry Nicholson, on the South by the said Nicholson's lot, and on the west by Pump Street, being the parcel of land now in the possession of the said Samuel Beall, which was sold and conveyed by Messrs. Tarpley and Thompson, merchants to James Purdie, and by the said Purdie to John Minson Galt, and Robert Anderson, September 17, 1782. (Page 140)

Since Purdie's lot was on the corner if Robert Anderson's lot adjoined his it would be to the east, or #21.

DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH AND RECORD.
By: __________________________

HB/vbl